<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Negative Book Reviewing: Audio Interview with John Metcalf</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nigelbeale.com/2009/05/on-negative-book-reviewing-audio-interview-with-john-metcalf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nigelbeale.com/2009/05/on-negative-book-reviewing-audio-interview-with-john-metcalf/</link>
	<description>Musings on the Book, Literature, Poetry, Literary Criticism, Collecting, Media, Life and the Arts, and Audio Interviews from The Biblio File radio program pertaining to same by a writer, broadcaster, bibliophile.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:48:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ross McKie</title>
		<link>http://nigelbeale.com/2009/05/on-negative-book-reviewing-audio-interview-with-john-metcalf/comment-page-1/#comment-53458</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross McKie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 17:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nigelbeale.com/?p=3280#comment-53458</guid>
		<description>In listening to Mr Metcalf&#039;s &quot;A Headmaster&#039;s Disgust&quot; here, I was reminded of this simple assessment over here, http://tinyurl.com/quzkg2.

A taste: &quot;...Metcalf is much better at identifying symptoms than diagnosing the underlying illness, and he is no good at all at prescribing a cure – his beloved “aesthetic approach” to literature being just as likely to lead to empty, middlebrow doily-making as to James Joyce.&quot;

Uh-oh. That&#039;s from Quill &amp; Quire...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In listening to Mr Metcalf&#8217;s &#8220;A Headmaster&#8217;s Disgust&#8221; here, I was reminded of this simple assessment over here, <a href="http://tinyurl.com/quzkg2" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/quzkg2</a>.</p>
<p>A taste: &#8220;&#8230;Metcalf is much better at identifying symptoms than diagnosing the underlying illness, and he is no good at all at prescribing a cure – his beloved “aesthetic approach” to literature being just as likely to lead to empty, middlebrow doily-making as to James Joyce.&#8221;</p>
<p>Uh-oh. That&#8217;s from Quill &amp; Quire&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
