adobe premiere elements tryout Buy cheap Adobe Audition 3 adobe audition free download adobe premiere elements video editing Buy cheap Adobe Premiere Elements 8 converting to adobe audition adobe premiere elements asio driver error Download Cheap soft adobe audition 2.0 ratings crack adobe audition 1.0 Buy cheap ABBYY FineReader 10 Professional Edition adobe premiere elements 3.0 forums abbyy finereader 9.0 Buy cheap Adobe Captivate 4 adobe audition 2 tutorials online adobe premiere elements 20 software Buy cheap Microsoft Streets and Trips 2010 microsoft streets and trips st keys
« Paris Review’s Philip Gourevitch on the worth of Author Interviews
A conversation with William Deresiewicz’s article in The Nation…Following James Wood into the Desert… »

The role of Artists; Writers as Magicians; and Zadie Smith versus reactionary Critics

Many ‘Modern’ writers and artists have sold out, says Alan Moore. They treat art simply as entertainment to be fed to apathetic, bored audiences who live only to die. The role of the artist is to give the audience not what it wants, he claims, but what it needs: to transform individuals, and more generally, society at large.

I’d add that artists might also actively question accepted norms, stretch perceived notions of right and wrong, good and bad; re-define the beautiful, the ‘real,’ the true; see and expose the unseen in society, know the unknown; provoke, astound; challenge the accepted.

Perhaps Zadie Smith agrees with this. Perhaps she may, however obtusely, be alluding to this role in her attack on Josepj O’Neill’s perfect ‘lyrically real’ novel Netherland.

I agree that much of what passes for good literature these days, isn’t, and that this is partly due to the accepted wisdom that nothing surpasses the aesthetic value found in ‘realism’ and its capacity to convey feeling and understanding. Perhaps all Smith is saying is that artists/novelists are today failing us in their duty to provoke and astound precisely because capitalism undermines the experimental, and ‘reactionary’ critics like James Wood — by eulogizing what exists and perpetuating the status quo,  condemning or at least undermining attempts to stretch, see and expose, — foster a climate inhospitable to the creation of genuinely innovative works of art and literature.

Perhaps this is what she is saying. Then again, given all the subtle shadings and layered logic that adorn her argument, how’s a clueless prole to know. 

 

  • Share/Bookmark

This entry was posted on Wednesday, November 26th, 2008 at 1:32 PM and is filed under Authors and Books. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

2 Responses to “The role of Artists; Writers as Magicians; and Zadie Smith versus reactionary Critics”

  1. Lisa Schamess Says:
    November 27th, 2008 at 10:44 AM

    As it happens, I am just today reading William Deresiewicz’s critique of Wood’s work. I am puzzled that no lesser than Cynthia Ozick has proclaimed him "the template" of contemporary criticism. Talk about contradictions. Then, too, is Wood’s sparkling writing with its insistently non-realistic metaphors, in praise of realism. Hmm. I don’t like isms.

  2. Lisa Schamess Says:
    November 27th, 2008 at 10:45 AM

    whoops, I forgot proper attribution…The essay by Deresiewicz appears in the December 8 2008 issue of The Nation.